Image

UNDERSTANDING EN 388:2016+A1:2018

Standard for Gloves Protecting Against Mechanical Risks

EN 388 is widely – recognized standard which safety gloves are commonly tested against across a huge range of industries. Any glove in the market which is categorized as cut-resistant should be marked to this standard. The EN 388 standard uses index values to rate the performance level of a glove in protecting the user against mechanical risks.

ABRASION TEST
ABRASION RESISTANCE (CYCLES) PERFORMANCE LEVEL RATING
100 1
500 2
2000 3
8000 4
Image

Image

UPDATED: ABRASION PAPER

This test is carried out through the Martindale Abrasion Machine. A sample material is cut from the palm of the glove and fitted to a rubbing head of fixed size and weight. This is moved in an elliptical motion over a table covered with abrasion paper. The performance level of the glove is measured by the number of abrasion cycles required to ‘hole’ the material. Four samples are tested in this way, with the overall performance level decided by the lowest result

TEAR TEST
TEAR RESISTANCE (NEWTONS) PERFORMANCE LEVEL RATING
10 1
25 2
50 3
75 4
Image

Image

TEAR RESISTANCE

In this test, four samples from the palm of the glove are clamped in a standard tensile strength testing machine. The jaws move apart at a speed of 100mm per minute and from this the force required to tear the sample is measured. Performance levels range from 1 (resistance of peak force between 10N and 25N) to 4 (tear strength is at least 70N). For single materials, the level is decided by the lowest result of the four tests. For multiple, unbonded layers, each layer must be tested individually and the level is based on the lowest individual result of the most tear resistant material.

 

COUPE TEST
CUT INDEX PERFORMANCE LEVEL RATING
1.2 1
2.5 2
5 3
10 4
20 5
Image

Image

COUPE TEST

Up until now, the ‘Coupe Blade Cut Test’ has been the standard test method for cut protection. A rotating circular blade moves horizon tally to-and-fro across a fabric sample with a fixed force of 5 Newton’s (N) applied from above. The test ends when the blade breaks through the sample material and the result is specified as an index value. This result is determined by the cycle count needed to cut through the sample and additionally by calculating the degree of wear and tear on the blade. This represents an exposure type cut risk in the workplace.

PUNCTURE TEST
PUNCTURE RESISTANCE (NEWTONS) PERFORMANCE LEVEL RATING
20 1
60 2
100 3
150 4
Image

Image

PUNCTURE RESISTANCE

This test consists of a compression test machine which pushes a rounded stylus 50mm (the size of a standard roofing nail) into the sample cut from the palm of the glove at a speed of 100mm per minute. From this, the maximum resistance force is recorded. Performance levels range from 1 (puncture resistance force of between 20N and 60N) to 4 (measured resistance of at least 150N). These levels are decided by the lowest of four test results.

 

NEW: EN ISO 13997 CUT TEST

For safety gloves created with materials designed to have a blunting effect on blades, additional cut protection tests must now be carried out and verified. Any sample fabric testing for cut resistance using the ‘Coupe Blade Cut Test’ which blunts the blade during the test, will be marked with an X and tested using the new EN ISO test. This is to ensure the degree of protection provided by the glove is as accurate as possible.

The objective of this new EN ISO 13997 cut test is to determine the resistance of the safety glove by applying the sample fabric with great force in a single movement, a better representation to the pressure type cut risk experienced in the workplace. To this end, a sharp-edged blade is dragged over the sample fabric once. This allows the accurate calculation of the minimum force required to cut the sample material at a thickness of 20mm. The result is displayed in Newton’s. There are 6 cut levels identified in the new EN ISO cut method.

Image

EN 374

Chemical Protection or micro-organisms

This standard specifies the demands of the requirements for a glove to protect against dangerous chemicals and micro-organisms.
Acceptable liquid penetrate quality standards. The Lower the index represent the better quality.
Performance Levels 1 2 3
AQL 4.0 1.5 0.65

Chemical Protection
Breakthrough time > 30 min. For at least 3 Chemicals from this list : (XYZ represent the code letter for 3 of these chemicals for which the glove obtained > 30 min. breakthrough time)

A. Methanol
B. Acetone
C. Acetonitrile
D. Dichloromethane
E. Carbon Disulphide
F. Toluene
G. Diethylamine
H. Tetrahydrofurane
I. Ethyl acetate
J. n-Heptane
K. Sodium Hydroxide 40%
L. Sulphuric Acid 96%

Performance Levels 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Minutes <10 10 30 60 120 240 >480

Chemical resistance against chemicals of choice (AQL < 4)

This pictogram can be used for gloves that don’t meet the above requirement and have an AQL of 4 or lower

 

EN ISO 21420
Ensures that gloves are comfortable to wear & safe to use. It covers length, sizing, dexterity, pH value, etc. All CAT II and CAT III gloves should comply with this standard.

 

CATEGORISATION
Category I
Minimal Risks
e.g Knitted/Dotted Gloves
Category II
Risks other than those listed in Categories I and III
e.g general handling gloves which require cut, puncture, and abrasion protection
Category III
Risks that may cause very serious consequences such as death or irreversible damage to health
e.g chemicals, biological agents, electric shock, and live working